Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Losee v. Gallegos, et al
as 14-4148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL GRANT LOSEE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MORRELL, PAUL GARDNER, LARRY BUSSIO and others
Leishman v. Patterson, et al
as 14-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP M. LEISHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM PATTERSON, Executive Director of the UDOC, MIKE HADDON, Deputy Director of the UDOC, LOWELL CLARK, Director of Institutional Operations for UDOC and others
Yoder v. Kirkpatrick, et al
as 12-4073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL W. YODER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL KIRKPATRICK, PAULA COOK, RICHARD BROWN and others
Leishman v. Patterson et al
as 2:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Leishman
Defendant:
Tom Patterson, Mike Haddon, Lowell Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Losee v. Gallegos et al
as 2:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Karl Grant Losee
Defendant:
FNU Gallegos, David Morrell, Paul Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Patterson, et al
as 10-4069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAYNE E. TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM PATTERSON, Director, Utah Department of Corrections, LOWELL CLARK, Director, Division of Institutional Operations of the Utah Department of Corrections and STATE OF UTAH
Yoder v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 2:2010cv00257
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Yoder
Defendant:
Paul Kirkpatrick, Paula Cook, Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Clark et al
as 2:2009cv01038
Plaintiff:
Carl Stanley Fleming
Defendant:
Lowell Clark, Mel Coulter, Darwin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Clark
as 09-4153
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR ANTHONY GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
LOWELL CLARK, Warden, Central Utah Correctional Facility
United States of America v. Clark et al
as 1:2009cv00748
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gayle Clark and Lowell Clark
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
