Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ryan v. Arledge et al
as 1:2016cv00158
Plaintiff:
Brent Everrett Ryan
Defendant:
Mike Arledge, Mark Miley, Rick Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell v. Stanford et al
as 1:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Darnell
Defendant:
Barry Stanford, Sara Rickit, Richard T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tabarris D Conner
Defendant:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center, Barry Standford, Richard T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fortner v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Fortner
Defendant:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center, Billy Pickens, Mike Arlidge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2012cv00191
Petitioner:
Charles Alton Burns
Respondent:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dowdle v. Perkins et al
as 1:2012cv00173
Plaintiff:
Elijah Bennett Dowdle
Defendant:
Billy Perkins, Butch Howard and Lowndes County Adult Detention Center Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Picker et al
as 1:2012cv00140
Petitioner:
Earnest Talley
Respondent:
Billy Picker and Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eggleston v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
Paul Eggleston
Defendant:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2011cv00246
Petitioner:
Rafael Payne
Respondent:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Easley v. Lowndes County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Easley
Defendant:
Lowndes County Adult Detention Center, Butch Howard, Billy Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
