Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Dwight Mitchell, et al v. Dakota County Social Services, et al
as 19-1419
Defendant / Appellee:
Diane Stang, individually and in her official capacity as Supervisor of Dakota County Social Services, Susan Boreland, individually and in her official capacity as Social Worker of Dakota County Social Services, Kathryn Scott, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant County Attorney of Dakota County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stop Child Protection Services From Legally Kidnapping, Bryce Mitchell and Dwight D. Mitchell, individually and on behalf of his children X.M. and A.M.
Kristina Greene, et al v. Mark Dayton, et al
as 15-1441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kristina Greene, Joan Spiczka, Paula Fleming and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Minnesota, Josh Tilsen, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Mediation Services, Lucinda Jesson, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services and others
In re: Lucinda Jesson, et al
as 14-3155
Petitioner:
In re: Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson, Kevin Moser and others
Greene et al v. Dayton et al
as 0:2014cv03195
Plaintiff:
Kristina Greene , Joan Spiczka , Paula Fleming and others
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Josh Tilsen , Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Saville et al v. Dayton et al
as 0:2013cv01281
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services , Josh Tilsen and others
Plaintiff:
Hollee Saville , Rebecca Swanson , Jean Lang and others
Intervenor_defendant:
AFSCME Council 5
Shannon Hollie v. Lucinda Jesson, et al
as 12-1357
Petitioner:
Shannon D. Hollie
Respondent:
Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Department of Human Services and Dennis Benson, Executive Director of Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
