Cases 1 - 10 of 10
USA v. Luis Carbajal
as 23-12993
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS ESTRADA CARBAJAL
ESTRADA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62764
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS ESTRADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTRADA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45570
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS ESTRADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estrada v. Viau
as 9:2016cv81966
Defendant:
Marc-Antoine Viau
Plaintiff:
Luis Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valencia et al v. M & Q SERVICES LLC
as 9:2015cv81394
Plaintiff:
Pablo Valencia , Frank Oseguda , Luis Estrada and others
Defendant:
M & Q SERVICES LLC and Mario Ferreira
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Estrada et al v. American Security Insurance Company
as 8:2014cv01588
Plaintiff:
Luis Estrada and Yaumara Perez
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estrada v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv21511
Plaintiff:
Luis Estrada
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jamie Estrada-Monzon v. Immigration and Naturalization, et al
as 11-13008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIE LUIS ESTRADA-MONZON, a.k.a. Jamie L. Estrada-Monzon
Defendant - Appellee:
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE and ROSEMARY MELVILLE, District Director, Atlanta, GA
Estrada-Monzon v. Polk County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2011cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luis Estrada-Monzon
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estrada-Monzon v. Immigration Naturalization Services et al
as 1:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
Jaime Luis Estrada-Monzon
Defendant:
Immigration Naturalization Services and Rosemary I. Melville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
