Cases 21 - 30 of 163
In Re: Combined World Trade
as 12-2964
Plaintiff:
Edgar C. Bayas, Robert Sienkiewicz, Various plaintiffs represented by Cannata/Grochow and others
Defendant:
100 Church, LLC, Zar Realty Management Corporation, Verizon New York Incorporated and others
Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
City of New York, AMEC Construction Management, Inc., Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Incorporated and others
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRIL
as 1:2012mc00229
Plaintiff:
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., MONIQUE JEFFERSON, MARK BANCROFT, MARCI CARRETO, and John Does 1 through 5 Who are as yet Unidentified Employees of Said Entiti
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80135
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Giovanniello v. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00806
Plaintiff:
William Giovanniello
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. , Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch Financial Markets Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80124
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Asset Management Fund et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04775
Plaintiff:
AMF Intermediate Mortgage Fund, AMF Short U.S. Government Fund, AMF U.S. Government Mortgage Fund and others
Defendant:
Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America Mortgage Securities, Inc. and others
Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04316
Defendant:
Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Bank Hapoalim B.M.
Consol Defendant:
Bank of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., CWABS, Inc., Credit Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC and others
Consol Plaintiff:
Principal Funds, Inc., Principal Life Insurance Company and Principal Variable Contracts Funds, Inc.
Principal Life Insurance Company et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04317
Defendant:
Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America Mortgage Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Principal Funds, Inc., Principal Life Insurance Company and Principal Variable Contracts Funds, Inc.
Asset Management Fund et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03791
Plaintiff:
Asset Management Fund, AMF Intermediate Mortgage Fund, AMF Ultra Short Fund and others
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , NB Holdings Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Asset Management Fund et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as NYS/1:12-cv-03791
Plaintiff:
Asset Management Fund, AMF Intermediate Mortgage Fund, AMF Ultra Short Fund and others
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , NB Holdings Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
