Cases 81 - 90 of 438
In Re: World Trade Center Lowe
as 12-2963
Plaintiff:
Dorota Markut, Lucyna Foremska, Richard Racioppi and others
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Tier 4 Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Tully Industries, Inc., Deutsche Bank, Logan LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Tully Construction Co., Inc. and City of New York
Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Worby Groner Edelman & Napoli Bern, LLP
Merrill Lynch Capital Services v. UISA Finance
as 12-2956
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Merrill Lynch Capital Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &Smith, Inc., Merrill Lynch Credit Products, LLC and Merrill Lynch &Co. Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
UISA Finance and USINAS Itamarati S.A.
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRIL
as 1:2012mc00229
Plaintiff:
Application of SEBASTIAN CANALE VALENTE, Petitioner, for an Order Directing Discovery from MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., and Affiliates, and from MONIQUE JEFFERSON and other employees
Defendant:
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., MONIQUE JEFFERSON, MARK BANCROFT, MARCI CARRETO, and John Does 1 through 5 Who are as yet Unidentified Employees of Said Entiti
Cause Of Action: M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou
David Thompson v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80135
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, FKA Amchem Products, Inc., FKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Giovanniello v. Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00806
Plaintiff:
William Giovanniello
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. , Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch Financial Markets Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Douglas Leite, et al v. Crane Company, et al
as 12-80124
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. LEITE and MARY ANN K. LEITE
Defendant - Respondent:
CRANE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, a foreign corporation, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., successor-in-interest to Rhone-Poulenc AG Company, a foreign company, AKA Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Benjamin Foster Products Company and others
Asset Management Fund et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04775
Plaintiff:
AMF Intermediate Mortgage Fund, AMF Short U.S. Government Fund, AMF U.S. Government Mortgage Fund and others
Defendant:
Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America Mortgage Securities, Inc. and others
IKB International S.A. In Liquidation et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv04036
Plaintiff:
IKB International S.A. In Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04316
Defendant:
Banc of America Funding Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Bank Hapoalim B.M.
Consol Defendant:
Bank of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., CWABS, Inc., Credit Based Asset Servicing and Securitization LLC and others
Consol Plaintiff:
Principal Funds, Inc., Principal Life Insurance Company and Principal Variable Contracts Funds, Inc.
Woori Bank v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03993
Plaintiff:
Woori Bank
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Merrill Lynch International, Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
