Cases 1 - 10 of 71
DUKE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Timmy Lynn Duke
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LYNN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00560
Petitioner:
CASSANDRA LYNN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
STEDJE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00503
Petitioner:
JOHN LYNN STEDJE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
TAMMY LYNN BROWN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MARTIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
DONALD LYNN MARTIN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ROMERO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00127
Petitioner:
PEGGY LYNN ROMERO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Haggart v. US
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CONGDON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02025
Petitioner:
LYNNE CONGDON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
JONES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01950
Petitioner:
CHERYL LYNN JONES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
LEWIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01939
Petitioner:
SHERI LYNN LEWIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
