Cases 1 - 8 of 8
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank v. Gibson et al
as 4:2010cv00557
Defendant:
James F. Gibson, Anna E. Gibson, Ben W. Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank v. Timberland Properties, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank and M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank
Defendant:
Timberland Properties, Inc. and Randall L Robb
Cause Of Action: Diversity
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank v. Timberland Properties, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank and M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank
Defendant:
Timberland Properties, Inc. and Randall L Robb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank v. Knotts et al
as 4:2009cv00035
Plaintiff:
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank and M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank
Defendant:
Gladys Ann Knotts and Thomas C Knotts
Cause Of Action: Diversity
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank v. Harper Bros. Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00979
Plaintiff:
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank
Defendant:
Harper Bros. Development, Inc., Donald G Harper and Sheryl I Harper
Cause Of Action: Diversity
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank v. Alexander Creek, LLC et al
as 4:2008cv00814
Plaintiff:
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank
Defendant:
Alexander Creek, LLC, Wayne H Brower, Larry A Hulbert and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank v. Capital T. Properties, LLC et al
as 4:2008cv00785
Plaintiff:
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank
Defendant:
Capital T. Properties, LLC, Thomas J. Farrar and Jennifer Lanning
Cause Of Action: Diversity
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank v. Renaissance Gardens, LLC et al
as 5:2008cv06028
Plaintiff:
M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank and M&I Marshall & Ilsely Bank
Defendant:
Renaissance Gardens, LLC, Renaissance Plaza, LLC and Kurt Degenhardt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
