Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gibbs v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Shante M. Gibbs
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Gibbs v. Bank of America Bank, N.A.
as 22-1344
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Investors, 100 Drug Raped Women and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene M. Gibbs
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Bank, N.A., Nationstar, DBA Mr. Cooper, United States: Freddie Mac and others
In Re: Eugene M. Gibbs
as 22-1032
Petitioner:
Eugene M. Gibbs
Respondent:
Bank of America Bank, N.A., Nationstar, DBA Mr. Cooper, Federal Housing Financial Agency, (FHFA) and others
Gibbs et al v. Bank of America Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Eugene M. Gibbs, United States of America, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Investors and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Bank, N.A., Nationstar doing business as Mr. Cooper, United States: Freddie Mac and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gibbs v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01909
Plaintiff:
Shante M. Gibbs
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Gibbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv02936
Plaintiff:
Florence M. Gibbs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gibbs v. The Commissioner of Social Security Administration of the United States
as 6:2013cv06457
Plaintiff:
Patrice M. Gibbs
Defendant:
The Commissioner of Social Security Administration of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alvarez et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01287
Plaintiff:
James Alvarez, Jr., Salvatore Ambrosiso, Andrew Anderson and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
