Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Joachain v. M-I L L C et al
as 2:2021cv00856
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp, M-I L L C d/b/a M-I SWACO, M-I Swaco and others
Plaintiff:
David Joachain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Benoit v. M-I L L C
as 2:2019cv00084
Plaintiff:
Patrick Benoit
Defendant:
M-I, LLC and M-I L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lagrange v. Schlumberger Technology Corp et al
as 6:2015cv01187
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lagrange
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corp and M I L L C
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
M-I L L C v. NordAq Energy, Inc.
as 4:2013cv01693
Plaintiff:
M-I L L C
Defendant:
NordAq Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Breaux et al v. Centrifruge Repair & Engineering L P, et al
as 2:2013cv00245
Defendant:
M-I L L C and Centrifruge Repair & Engineering L P
Plaintiff:
Joshua Breaux and Amber Breaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
M-I L L C v Stelly et al
as 4:2010mc00242
Movant:
Wellbore Energy Solutions L L C and Gilbert H Dozier
Plaintiff:
M-I L L C
Respondent:
Chris A Verret
Defendant:
Chad Lee Stelly , Stephen Squyres and Benton Thomas Knobloch
Mech-Tech Engineering L L C v. M-I L L C
as 6:2010mc00016
Movant:
Mech Tech Engineering L L C
Respondent:
M-I L L C
In Re Wellbore Energy v M-I L L C
as 6:2009mc00047
Movant:
Wellbore Energy Solutions L L C
Respondent:
BlueLine Manufacturing Inc
Plaintiff:
M-I L L C and M-I L L C
M-I L L C v Stelly et al
as 6:2009mc00043
Movant:
Wellbore Energy Solutions, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
M-I L L C
Respondent:
Chris A Verret
Defendant:
Chad Lee Stelly, Chad Lee Stelly, Stephen Squyres and others
Weston v. M-I L L C et al
as 2:2007cv01978
Plaintiff:
Charles Weston
Defendant:
M-I L L C and Randy Fruge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
