Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Garcia v. Currie et al
as 2:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Pedro Tiempo Garcia
Defendant:
G. Currie, M. Barber, B. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Currie et al
as 2:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
Gabriel M Gonzales
Defendant:
G. L. Currie, M. Barber, D. S. Mayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Capt. Jamison et al
as 2:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Joe Cooper
Defendant:
Capt. Jamison, R. Stamm, Capt. Benevides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Castro et al
as 2:2012cv00337
Plaintiff:
Larenzo Glenn
Defendant:
E. Castro, Lt. Todd and M. Barber
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Barber
as 5:2012cv00794
Respondent:
M Barber and Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Paul Young Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Barber et al
as 2:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Joe Cooper
Defendant:
M Barber, C Monroe, Denis Miller and others
Amicu:
TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Barber et al
as 2:2012cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Glenn
Defendant:
M. Barber, E. Castro, L. Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Barber et al
as 2:2012cv00174
Petitioner:
Joe Cooper
Respondent:
M Barber, Monroe and Dennis Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Giles et al v. BP p.l.c., et al
as 4:2012cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dale Giles , Adam Abrahms , Mark J. Adamson and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c.,, BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barber v. Edenfield
as 1:2010cv00288
Petitioner:
Brent M. Barber
Respondent:
K. Edenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
