Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Chung Kao v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2011cv01899
Defendant:
M Acuna, R Ballesteros, C Bliss and others
Plaintiff:
Chung Kao
Stringham v. Bick et al
as 2:2009cv00286
Plaintiff:
Guy T. Stringham
Defendant:
J. Bick, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Medical Facility and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Neumann v. Martin Veal, et al
as 09-15063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES NEUMANN, Keith Neumann
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN VEAL, Warden, M. CRY, Appeal Coordinator, D. SILBAUGH, Chief Psychologist and others
Tommy Keeton v. Caroll, et al
as 08-16808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY ROY KEETON
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLL, Sgt., . ROSZKO, ELLIAS and others
Massey v. Knowles, et al
as 2:2008cv01824
Plaintiff:
Craig Massey
Defendant:
Mike Knowles, P. Manderville, Barry K. Newman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Montue v. Teresa Schwartz, et al
as 08-15924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN C. MONTUE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERESA A. SCHWARTZ, R. PETTIGREW, M. DUNLOP and others
Terrell Ray O'Neal v. Dr. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv01631
Plaintiff:
Terrell Ray O'Neal
Defendant:
Jones, Garrett, Hammant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
O'Neal v. Voong et al
as 2:2007cv02578
Plaintiff:
Terrell O'Neal
Defendant:
Voong, C.D. Olivio, M. Cry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
August v. Dovey, et al
as 07-16844
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL W. AUGUST
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN DOVEY, Director Adult Institutions, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of the CDCR, MARTIN VEAL, Warden and others
Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2007cv01902
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Henry Pamer
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeanne Woodford, Rod Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
