Cases 1 - 10 of 318
Selvin Carranza, et al v. Janine K. Jeffery, et al
as 23-55180
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SELVIN ORLANDO CARRANZA
Appellant:
JANINE K. JEFFERY
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM SUGLICH, Chairperson Chief Deputy Warden (A) for Richard J. Donovan (RJD), ALAN HERNANDEZ, Associate Warden (AW) for Richard J. Donovan (RJD), EDWARD GARCIA, CCPOA Representative/Correctional Captain at RJ Donovan and others
Defendant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary for CDCR, JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary for CDCR and others
Pablo Salas v. M. Biter
as 22-16767
Petitioner / Appellant:
PABLO SALAS
Respondent / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Maurice Miles, Sr. v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70161
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MAURICE MILES, Sr. and M. D. BITER, Warden
Petitioner:
MAURICE MILES, Sr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Fred Jackson v. M. Biter
as 21-17026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRED JAY JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Michael Sullivan v. M. Biter, et al
as 21-16842
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Defendant:
MATTHEW CATE, J. CLARK KELSO, D. FOSTON and others
Jaime Cesar Coronel v. M.D. Biter
as 5:2012cv00974
Petitioner:
Jaime Cesar Coronel
Respondent:
M D Biter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Barron v. M. Biter
as 19-56007
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE FRANK BARRON
Respondent / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
(PC) Rodriguez v. Cate et al
as 2:2019cv01797
Defendant:
M. D. Biter and Matthew Cate
Plaintiff:
Erick Eddie Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry King v. M. Biter, et al
as 18-15743
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY DONNELL KING
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden, D. TARNOFF, J. ACEBEDO and others
Saul Cervantes v. M. Biter
as 19-55168
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAUL CERVANTES
Respondent / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
