Cases 1 - 10 of 13
COMMON CAUSE FLORIDA et al v. LEE et al
as 5:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE FLORIDA, FairDistricts now, Dorothy Inman-Johnson and others
Defendant:
LAUREL M LEE, WILTON SIMPSON, CHRIS SPROWLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COMMON CAUSE FLORIDA et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE FLORIDA, FAIRDISTRICTS NOW, DOROTHY INMAN-JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL M LEE, WILTON SIMPSON, CHRIS SPROWLS and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ARTEAGA, LENI FERNANDEZ, ANDREA HERSHORIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain v. Lee
as 6:2021mc00108
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Pierre Robert Joseph
Defendant:
Laura M. Lee, Claude Dora, Dara Khosrowshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HETHERINGTON v. LEE
as 3:2021cv00671
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH, JONI ALEXIS POITIER and others
Plaintiff:
KELLS HETHERINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gumbs v. Tony et al
as 0:2020cv62384
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Howard Finkelstein, Kevin Michael Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Liston Theodield Gumbs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY INC v. LEE et al
as 4:2019cv00298
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY and LAUREL M LEE
Plaintiff:
21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY INC. and 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY INC
Intervenor:
MICHAEL KATIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MENDEZ v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2019cv00272
Respondent:
CRAIG LATIMER, LAUREL M LEE and RON DESANTIS
Petitioner:
LUIS A MENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Pollack and Rosen, P.A. et al
as 0:2017cv60610
Plaintiff:
Tamyka M. Lee
Defendant:
Pollack and Rosen, P.A. and Joseph F. Rosen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
