Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McCabe v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Dennis McCabe
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Aaron Ford, Dr M Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 22-1945
Appellant:
In re: GLENN E. RIGGS, JOSEPH J. BAINOR, STANLEY M. BAINOR and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 21-2108
Appellant:
RALPH K. BRECHTER, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, JON L. CLOW and others
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Graham v. Schlager et al
as 3:2020cv00078
Defendant:
M. Naughton, Philip S. Schlager, Michael Minev and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birch Jr v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2019cv01338
Defendant:
V. Austin, B Faulkner, Monique Hubbard Pickett and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Patrick Birch Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caballero v. Aranas et al
as 3:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Gene Yup, M. Naughton, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Caballero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Aranas et al
as 2:2018cv02191
Defendant:
Bob Faulkner, Patricia Wilson, F Oakman and others
Plaintiff:
Jaysen Alexander Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clary v. Mark et al
as 3:2018cv00477
Defendant:
Ron Schreckengost, M. Naughton, Mark, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Clary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broomfield v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00295
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, C. Lucas, M. Naughton and others
Plaintiff:
Steven City Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00136
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas and M. Naughton
Plaintiff:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
