Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Mitchell v. CA Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv02899
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
CA Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Macomber, C. Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Brown v. USDC-CAFR
as 22-70260
Not Classified By Court:
In re: BOBBY E. BROWN, OTTO MARROQUIN, Correctional Officer at KVSP, DARIUS CAMPBELL, Correctional Officer at KVSP and others
Petitioner:
BOBBY E. BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
(PC) Ruiz v. Pompa et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
M. Pompa and D. Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mitchell v. Diaz et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
John E. Mitchell
Defendant:
R. Diaz, C. Pfeifer, D. Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mitchell v. Diaz et al
as 2:2021cv02406
Plaintiff:
John E. Mitchell
Defendant:
R. Diaz, C. Pfeifer, D. Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mitchell v. Diaz et al
as 2:2021cv01721
Plaintiff:
John E. Mitchell
Defendant:
R. Diaz, C. Pfeifer, A. Leyva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mitchell v. Diaz et al
as 1:2021cv01434
Plaintiff:
John E. Mitchell
Defendant:
R. Diaz, C. Pfeifer, A. Leyva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bobby E.Brown v. Marroquin et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Christian Pfeiffer, Otto Marroquin, Darius Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Tommy Mackey v. Goss et al
as 1:2018cv00988
Defendant:
R. Rodriguez, J. Garcia, D. Goss and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Mackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J and J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Rogelio Pompa Rangel et al
as 2:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Teresa M Pompa and Rogelio Pompa Rangel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
