Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Kirk Williams v. USDC, Sacramento
as 12-70742
:
In re: KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Troy Magarrell v. P. Mangis, et al
as 11-17809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY MAGARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
P. MANGIS, MD and S. M. ROCHE, Medical Doctor
Roche et al v. Northland Group, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02706
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Roche and Stacey Roche
Defendant:
Northland Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirk Williams v. State of California, et al
as 11-17747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Quality Food Products, Inc. v. P&T Produce et al
as 1:2011cv08048
Plaintiff:
Quality Food Products, Inc.
Defendant:
P&T Produce, Thomas E Roche and Patricia M Roche
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Alex Ross v. A. David, et al
as 11-17086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX DEON ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. DAVID, D. SWINGLE, S. M. ROCHE and others
Tai Huynh v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 11-15177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAI HUYNH
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, MIKE MCDONALD, TOM FELKER and others
Nobleza et al v. Macy's, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv02064
Plaintiff:
Patria L. Nobleza , Jerome F. Harbinson and John D. Burns
Defendant:
Macy's, Inc., Macy's Inc. Pension and Profit Sharing Administrative Committee, The Macy's Inc. Board of Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Allen v. Roche et al
as 2:2009cv03068
Plaintiff:
Bryant Allen
Defendant:
S. M. Roche and T. Felker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Williams, Sr. v. S. Roche, et al
as 09-16855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN WILLIAMS, Sr.
Defendant:
S. M. ROCHE, Chief Physician Surgeon, M. WATSON, Dr., GLENN JAMES, Dr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD, Lt.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
