Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Burlington Drug Company, Inc. et al v. Merck & Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc., J M Smith Corporation doing business as Smith Drug Company and others
Defendant:
Merck & Company, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Schering-Plough Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re:
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party:
Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Estate of Michael Heiser et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2009mc00048
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Michael Heiser, Gary Heiser, Francis Heiser and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
The Estate of Millard D. Campbell, Marie R. Campbell, Bessie A. Campbell and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and others
Rangos v. Carmax, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00821
Plaintiff:
Peter Rangos
Defendant:
Carmax, Inc., Michael K. Dolan, Keith D. Browning and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
