Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Smith v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv10564
Plaintiff:
Candice M. Smith and Eric S. Smith
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Fleshman et al
as 3:2012cv00213
Plaintiff:
Darnell M Smith
Defendant:
Gist Fleshman, Julie M Koerner and John W Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Koerner et al
as 3:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Darnell M Smith
Defendant:
Julie M Koerner, David A Perkins, John P Heil, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv13344
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M. Smith and Nancy Ramirez
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Bayer Schering Pharma AG et al
as 3:2010cv10874
Plaintiff:
Nicole M. Smith
Defendant:
Bayer Schering Pharma AG and Bayer Healthcare Pharmauceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Parker
Defendant:
Michael Randle, Jackie Miller, Dana M. Tylka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Feinerman et al
as 3:2009cv00326
Plaintiff:
Earl M. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Feinerman, Sam Stokes, Memorial Hospital of Carbondale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 3:2008cv00244
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Evelyn M. Smith, Unknown Owners, Unknown Heirs and Legatees and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Smith et al v. Merscorp Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00112
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Smith and Audrey M. Smith
Defendant:
Merscorp Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
