Cases 1 - 10 of 136
1718 Las Palmas, LLC v. Bianca M. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
1718 Las Palmas, LLC doing business as Archer Apartments
Defendant:
Bianca M. Smith, Alvaro Bravo and Does 1 to 10
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicois M. Smith v. Warden D. Silva
as 2:2023cv09429
Petitioner:
Nicois M. Smith
Respondent:
Warden D. Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Zanoni
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
John Zanoni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur G. Smith et al v. MAS Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Arthur G Smith and Kerri M Smith
Defendant:
MAS Financial Services, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carlos M. Smith v. Northrup Grumman Space and Missions Systems Corp Salaried Pension Plan et al
as 2:2023cv02914
Plaintiff:
Carlos M Smith and Carlos M. Smith
Defendant:
Northrup Grumman Corporation, Northrup Grumman Space & Missions Systems Corp Salaried Pension Plan, Northrup Grumman Space and Missions Systems Corp Salaried Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Smith v. Mimms
as 1:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Smith
Defendant:
Margret Mimms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
