Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Montgomery v. Brewer Jr et al
as 3:2018cv01845
Defendant:
William Brewer Jr, Wayne Brewer, M Williams Jr and others
Plaintiff:
George William Montgomery, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Defendant:
Damon R. Williams and Tiffany M. Williams
Counter_claimant:
Tiffany M. Williams and Damon R. Williams
Counter_defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Pope et al
as 5:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Alishia N. Morris
Defendant:
K. Pope, S. Jasper, G. Diabala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Venzor et al
as 5:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Alishia N. Morris
Defendant:
M. Venzor, D. Hearn, NFN Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Unknown Picket Control Officer et al
as 6:2017cv00095
Defendant:
10 Unknown Baylor Scott and White Hospital Employees, 10 Unknown Coryell County Sheriffs Who Work at Hughes Unit, 10 Unknown Gatesville Municipal City Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Ben M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00713
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin M. Williams
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Downhole Technology LLC v. Silver Creek Services Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Downhole Technology LLC
Defendant:
Silver Creek Services Inc., StormField Innovative Technologies, LLC, Daniel R. Coffee and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Downhole Technology LLC v. Silver Creek Services Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00823
Plaintiff:
Downhole Technology LLC
Defendant:
Silver Creek Services Inc., StormField Innovative Technologies, LLC, Michael Didier and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
