Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hill v. M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09609
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC, The Este Lauder Companies Inc., M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammeka Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Graham v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2020cv08876
Defendant:
Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc., THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY, individually and as successor in interest to YARDLEY OF LONDON, INC., LAURA MERCIER COSMETICS and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04481
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Tiziana Bellomo and M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Johnson v. M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv09157
Defendant:
M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. and The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Donohue v. M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04418
Plaintiff:
Ashley Donohue
Defendant:
M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc., Make-Up Art Cosmetics (New York), Inc., Make-Up Art Cosmetics (U.S.), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
