Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Maaco Franchisor SPV LLC v. J&L Auto Services LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISOR SPV LLC
Defendant:
J&L AUTO SERVICES LLC, LILIANA M. ASTETE and JOEL R. ROSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Knack Fix, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Defendant:
Knack Fix, LLC, Aws Hattab and Eyas Hattab
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Defendant:
David L. Smith and Pavel V. Tolstov
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. TM Clackamas, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00668
Defendant:
TONY D. STEELMAN, TM CLACKAMAS, LLC and Tony D Steelman
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Sadwick, et al
as 3:2020cv00147
Defendant:
Gregg A. Sadwick and Greba Corporation
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. KENNEVAN, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Zachary Lafferty, Kennevan, LLC and Kara Lafferty
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Cipercen, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00461
Defendant:
Cipercen, LLC, Jorge Cereijo and Andres Burzaco
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Cruce et al
as 3:2018cv00361
Defendant:
William D. Cruce, Marilyn A. Cruce and Cruco Production Auto Painting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Kahan et al
as 3:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchisor SPV, LLC
Defendant:
Don B. Kahan and Don B. Kahan Trust
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Maaco Franchising, LLC v. Boensch et al
as 3:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Boensch, Lori J. Boensch, Ronald E. Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
