Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AP MOLLER - MAERSK A/S et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv21745
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
AP MOLLER - MAERSK A/S, MAERSK LINE UK LIMITED and MAERSK INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AP MOLLER - MAERSK A/S et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv21745
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
AP MOLLER - MAERSK A/S, MAERSK LINE UK LIMITED and MAERSK INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MAERSK, INC. v. 5K LOGISTICS, INC.
as 2:2014mc00178
Plaintiff:
MAERSK, INC.
Defendant:
5K LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
MAERSK INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER A/S v. BELSUN CORP.
as 2:2013mc00014
Plaintiff:
MAERSK INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER A/S
Defendant:
BELSUN CORP.
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S,
as 2:2012mc00145
Plaintiff:
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S,
Defendant:
T.J.D. INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S, v. CHARMI INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
as 2:2009mc00017
Plaintiff:
MAERSK, INC., as agents for A.P. MOLLER-MAERSK A/S,
Defendant:
CHARMI INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
BRIDGE TERMINAL TRANSPORT, INC. et al v. MILLER et al
as 3:2008cv01624
Respondent:
MARK A. MILLER, DELIA BROOKE MILLER, SEA CASTLE CHASSIS and others
Petitioner:
BRIDGE TERMINAL TRANSPORT, INC., MAERSK CONTAINER SERVICE COMPANY, INC., MAERSK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PRAIRIE MINES & ROYALTY LTD. et al v. MAERSK INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03560
Plaintiff:
PRAIRIE MINES & ROYALTY LTD. and COAL VALLEY RESOURCES INC.
Defendant:
MAERSK INC., MAERSK SOUTH AFRICA(PTY) LTD., MAERSK CANADA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
