Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
STATE OF MAINE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00406
Plaintiff: STATE OF MAINE and MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
STATE OF MAINE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00217
Plaintiff: STATE OF MAINE and MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Frontier Communications v. Centerpoint Energy Resources, et al
as 11-1778
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, f/k/a Citizens Communications Company
Defendant: BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., BEAZER EAST, INC., DEAD RIVER COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee: CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. and UGI UNTILITIES INC.
Third Party Defendant: ROBINSON SPEIRS, ELIZABETH H. SPEIRS, MARY S. PRICE and others
Intervenor: MAINE, STATE OF and MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Scarborough Citizens Protect, et al v. US Fish and Wildlife Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1597
Plaintiff - Appellant: SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES, DAVID T. PAUL, PAUL AUSTIN and others
Defendant - Appellee: US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, GOVERNOR, STATE OF MAINE and others
SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES et al v. US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00315
Plaintiff: SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES , DAVID T PAUL , PAUL AUSTIN and others
Defendant: US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, GOVERNOR, STATE OF MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
MALLINCKRODT LLC et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSIONER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00420
Plaintiff: MALLINCKRODT LLC and UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSIONER , MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Riches v. Citizens Communications Compan
as 08-1930
Plaintiff: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., STATE OF ME, BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC. and others
Movant - Appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Riches v. Citizens Communications Compan
as 08-1930
Plaintiff: BANGOR, ME
Defendant / Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
Not Classified By Court: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., STATE OF MAINE, BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS, INC. and others
Petitioner / Appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2777
Plaintiff: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Defendant - Appellant: DEAD RIVER COMPANY, ROBINSON SPEIRS, JULIE ANN MACMANNIS and others
City of Bangor v. Citizens Communicat., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2759
Plaintiff: BANGOR, ME
Defendant - Appellee: CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and STATE OF ME
Defendant: MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD CO., US DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GUILFORD TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant: BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., BEAZER EAST, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?