Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Hammond v. Bergami
as 3:2023cv50355
Petitioner:
Terry G. Hammond
Respondent:
Mr. Maldonado and Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Willis et al
as 3:2023cv02804
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Anthony Willis, Rob Jeffreys, Mr. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Kevin Reichert, Sara McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blacha v. Maldonado
as 1:2023cv04603
Petitioner:
Marek Blacha
Respondent:
United States of America and Raul Maldonado
Plaintiff:
United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cervantes v. Willis et al
as 3:2023cv02176
Plaintiff:
Marcos Cervantes
Defendant:
Anthony D Willis, Daniel C Porter, Alex A Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2022cv06961
Petitioner:
Anthony Crenshaw
Respondent:
Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Guyton v. Martino et al
as 1:2022cv03598
Plaintiff:
Kendall Guyton
Defendant:
Ivan Martino, Raul Maldonado, Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guyton v. Martino et al
as 2:2022cv02139
Plaintiff:
Kendall Guyton
Defendant:
Ivan Martino, Raul Maldonado, Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thedford v. Directior of B.O.P. et al
as 1:2022cv03032
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Thedford
Defendant:
Directior of B.O.P., Maldonado and Lt. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gibson v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Petitioner:
Marland Henry Gibson
Respondent:
R. Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
