Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Clarence Dace v. Kristina Skeens, et al
as 20-2924
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GARLICK, Psychologist/Committee Member, RANDY PFISTER, KRISTINA SKEENS, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE DACE
Kedron Jones, Jr. v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-3048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEDRON JONES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY ERVIN, JEFFREY KORTE, MARCUS HARDY, Warden and others
Mark Scott v. Marcus Hardy, et al
as 19-2699
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTOR TRANCOSO, Major, RANDY PFISTER, Warden, JEFF EILTS, Counselor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK SCOTT
Jarvis Neely v. John Baldwin, et al
as 19-1177
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN R. BALDWIN, IDOC Director, MARCUS HARDY, Warden, Warden for Stateville CC, JUSTIN WILKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARVIS H. NEELY
Clarence Dace v. Kristina Skeens, et al
as 19-1015
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GARLICK, Psychologist/Committee Member, RANDY PFISTER, KRISTINA SKEENS, Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE DACE
Steven Zirko v. Parthasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 18-2039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ZIRKO
Defendant - Appellee:
PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor, CATALINO BAUTISTA, M.D., MARCUS HARDY, Warden and others
Willie McClain v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 17-3387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, MARCUS HARDY, Warden and others
Oswaldo Gonzalez v. Marcus Hardy, et al
as 17-1073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSWALDO GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS HARDY, Warden and LANDRIA A. DENNIS
Ronald Ruhl v. Marcus Hardy, et al
as 16-3477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD RUHL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS HARDY, Warden, MICHAEL P. RANDLE and LISA MADIGAN
Cleveland Garner v. Mary Miller, et al
as 16-2599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEVELAND GARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY MILLER, Medical Director, VIPIN K. SHAH, Doctor, MARCUS HARDY, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
