Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Abney v. Floyd Co. Jail
as 4:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mark James Abney
Defendant:
Floyd Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20419
Plaintiff:
MARK JAMES HORN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Mark Williams
as 22-11722
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK JAMES WILLIAMS
Clarence Simmons, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 22-90006
Petitioner:
CLARENCE SIMMONS, BRANDON MUNGUIA, JORGE ARROYAVE and others
Respondent:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Schulman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
Mark James Schulman
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BONAGOFSKY v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04759
Plaintiff:
MARK JAMES BONAGOFSKY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LOOMIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv01382
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK JAMES LOOMIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOARDMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98504
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK JAMES BOARDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv69419
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK JAMES HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33063
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK JAMES ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
