Cases 1 - 10 of 19
GILBERTI v. STATE OF ISRAEL et al
as 4:2026cv00262
Defendant:
ISRAEL CHEMICAL LIMITED, THE STATE OF ISRAEL, MEDINAT NASI YISRAEL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D GILBERTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Wright, III v. Martin Fitzpatrick
as 26-10528
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
MARTIN A. FITZPATRICK
WRIGHT v. FITZPATRICK
as 4:2025cv00491
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT
Defendant:
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Fitzpatrick
as 1:2025cv06512
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Wright
Defendant:
Martin A. Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Fitzpatrick
as 2:2025cv00825
Petitioner:
Remoi Campbell
Respondent:
Judge Martin A. Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. FITZPATRICK
as 4:2025cv00395
Petitioner:
REMOI CAMPBELL
Respondent:
MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SYMONETTE v. MCLANEY et al
as 1:2024cv00242
Defendant:
MIKE JULIUS MCLANEY, DANIEL DIAZ, RONEL PIERRILIEN and others
Plaintiff:
VEDRICK LAMONTE SYMONETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMONETTE v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Defendant:
JAY, J LEWIS, B L THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
VEDRICK LAMONTE SYMONETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMONETTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 4:2024cv00400
Defendant:
UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
VEDRICK LAMONTE SYMONETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
