Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. Hayes
as 3:2017cv00233
Defendant:
Toya Leona Marie Hayes
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Hayes v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03429
Plaintiff:
Mary Hayes
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simon v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2015cv02789
Plaintiff:
Ivory Lane Simon
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Keith Deville, Jody Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craven et al v. Thor California, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sheila Craven , Teresa Crisp , Barbara Dillon and others
Defendant:
Thor California, Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes et al v. Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08055
Defendant:
Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, CH2M Hill, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Hayes, Angel Hayes, Angel Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Epperly et al v. Indiana Building Systems, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv06499
Defendant:
Indiana Building Systems, LLC, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Epperly and Mary Hayes Epperly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Epperly et al v. Indiana Building Systems, LLC
as 2:2009cv00941
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Epperly and Mary Hayes Epperly
Defendant:
Indiana Building Systems L L C, Indiana Building Systems L L C, Fluor Enterprises Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Blane et al v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00395
Plaintiff:
Margaret Blane, Mr. Margaret Blane, Michael Braid and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
