Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SK nexilis Co., Ltd. v. Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
SK nexilis Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd., Volta Energy Solutions S.A.R.L., Volta Energy Solutions Europe KFT and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC v. Hefei Kenuo Trading Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Wearable Shoe Tree, LLC
Defendant:
Hefei Kenuo Trading Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Huangxuan Trading Co., Ltd., Guangzhou Anwai Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
US Synthetic Corporation v. Shenzhen Haimingrun Superhard Materials Co., Ltd.
as 4:2020cv03966
Plaintiff:
US Synthetic Corporation
Defendant:
Shenzhen Haimingrun Superhard Materials Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Tama Group v. Zhejiang Yajia Packaging Materials Co Ltd
as 3:2020cv03048
Defendant:
Zhejiang Yajia Packaging Materials Co Ltd
Plaintiff:
Tama Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Mertlitz v. Taishan Gypsum Co. f/k/a Shandong Taihe Dongxin Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Andy Mertlitz
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. f/k/a Shandong Taihe Dongxin Co., Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd., Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lochhead et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 7:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lochhead and Maria Webste
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd., Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Semi-Materials Co., Ltd. et al v. MEMC Pasadena, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00991
Plaintiff:
Semi-Materials Co., Ltd. and SMC Shanghai
Defendant:
MEMC Pasadena, Inc. and MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
