Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Ralph Coleman, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 23-15755
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RALPH COLEMAN, PETER THOMAS COCKCROFT, ERNESTO VENEGAS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor, State of California, JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, JOE STEPHENSHAW, Director of the Department of Finance and others
Appellee:
MATTHEW A. LOPES, Jr., Special Master
Gavin Newsom, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 19-71493
Petitioner:
PAMELA AHLIN, Director of the Department of State Hospitals, DIANA TOCHE, Undersecretary for Health Care Services of the CDCR, KATHERINE TEBROCK, Deputy Director of the Statewide Mental Heath Program and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GAVIN NEWSOM, KATHERINE TEBROCK, Deputy Director of the Statewide Mental Health Program and MICHAEL COHEN, Director of the Department of Finance for the State of California
Not Yet Classified:
RALPH COLEMAN and MATTHEW A. LOPES, Jr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Driver v. Lopes et al
as 2:2011cv02877
Plaintiff:
Billy Driver, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew A Lopes, Jr, Tim Virga, NG. Sup. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman, et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 2:1990cv00520
Plaintiff:
Ralph Coleman , Winifred Williams , David J Heroux and others
Defendant:
John S Zil, MD , Nadim Khoury , Joseph Sandoval and others
Intervenor:
USA, - California Correctional Peace Officers Association , County of Santa Clara and others
Pecial_master:
Matthew A Lopes, Jr
Receiver:
Robert Sillen and J. Clark Kelso
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Robert Hecker
Amicu:
AFSCME Local 2620 , Psychology Shield , California Psychiatric Association and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Anthony Adams , Joel Anderson , Tom Berryhill and others
Movant:
Patrick Wilson and Christopher T Burns
Unknown:
Elwood Lui , Peter - Siggins and Sherie Lemire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
