Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Champagne v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10316
Plaintiff:
ERIC CHAMPAGNE
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. , DraftKings Inc., ETHAN HASKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp
Wax et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10285
Plaintiff:
Barry Wax and Kenneth Rosen
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc., DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10239
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GOMEZ , Ricardo Alejandro Garcia and John Gerecs
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc. , DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: DAILY FANTASY SPORTS LITIGATION
as 1:2016md02677
Defendant:
DAILY FANTASY SPORTS LITIGATION, MATTHEW BOCCIO, FANDUEL DEPOSITS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Hemrich, Kelly Griffin, Steven Brown and others
Amicus Curiae:
Aaron Rivera, Glenn Pena and Joseph Leckerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wax et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv24450
Plaintiff:
Barry Wax and Kenneth Rosen
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc., DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Champagne v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:15-CV-08399
Plaintiff:
Eric Champagne
Defendant:
Fanduel, Inc. , DraftKings, Inc. , Ethan Haskell and others
Champagne v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:15-cv-08399
Plaintiff:
Eric Champagne
Defendant:
Fanduel, Inc. , DraftKings, Inc. , Ethan Haskell and others
GOMEZ et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as FLS/1:15-cv-23858
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc. , DraftKings, Inc. , SAAHIL SUD and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GOMEZ and Ricardo Alejandro Garcia
Champagne v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08399
Plaintiff:
Eric Champagne
Defendant:
Fanduel, Inc., DraftKings, Inc., Ethan Haskell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as FLS/1:15-cv-23858
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GOMEZ and Ricardo Alejandro Garcia
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc. , DraftKings, Inc. , SAAHIL SUD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
