Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Robert Schwartz v. Domingo Uribe, Jr., et al
as 19-55450
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT DEANE SCHWARTZ
Lonnie Brown v. Matthew Cates, et al
as 14-16971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CHARLES BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATES, Director, CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, GONZALVES, Correctional Officer and others
Marvin Gordon v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-15502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN R. GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and R. GROUNDS, Warden
Charles Williams v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-17163
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director of C.D.C.R. and DANIEL PARAMO, Warden
Marvin Gordon v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-16831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN R. GORDON, a/k/a Vance Gordon
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, R. GROUNDS, Warden, R. MARTINEZ, Captain and others
Quang Tran v. Matthew Cate
as 13-56344
Petitioner - Appellant:
QUANG MINH TRAN
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director of CDCR
Denis O'Brien v. Matthew Cate
as 13-56287
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENIS O'BRIEN
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director of the California Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Esrom Madrid v. Matthew Cate
as 13-55778
Petitioner - Appellant:
ESROM MADRID
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATES, Director
Jesus Mejia v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-15823
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS MEJIA
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director, CDCR and R. BARNEA, Warden, CCC State Prison
Kenreid Foster v. Matthew Cate
as 13-15762
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENREID C. FOSTER
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Director of CDCR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
