Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Hibbard v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Hibbard
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department, Justin Mcree and Jacob Maryhew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13071
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MATTHEW RICHARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poulin v. USA
as 4:2023cv04129
Petitioner:
Matthew Richard Poulin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HAHN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14337
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARD HAHN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRANDON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15597
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARD BRANDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RICHARDS et al v. LAMAS-RICHIE et al
as 2:2022cv01209
Counter Defendant:
Matthew Richards
Plaintiff:
Mars Media, LLC
Defendant:
Nik Lamas-Richie, RICHIE MEDIA CORPORATION and RELIC AGENCY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04528
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARD KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51282
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00116
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Jones and Ashlee Marie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50853
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
