Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tallie v. Pittsburg Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Tallie
Defendant:
Pittsburg Police Department, Adan Nance, Lori Bolton-Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS TO BE MADE IN CASE NO. 2:15-cr-20050-JAR-1 ONLY.***
as 2:2019cv02145
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joshua L. McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Haberer et al
as 5:2018cv03246
Defendant:
Corizon Company, Connie R. Delperdang, Deane Donley and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03136
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. McBride et al
as 5:2015cv03150
Plaintiff:
David C. McDaniel
Defendant:
Bill McBride and Gene Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. McBride et al
as 5:2015cv03144
Plaintiff:
David C. McDaniel
Defendant:
Bill McBride, Seward County Sheriff's Department and Gene Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. McBride et al
as 5:2015cv03141
Plaintiff:
David C. McDaniel
Defendant:
(fnu) McBride, Seward County Sheriff's Department and Daniel Togbeola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. USA
as 2:2013cv02083
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Keith McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Beaver v. Koerner et al
as 5:2009cv03108
Plaintiff:
Marsha R. Beaver
Defendant:
(fnu) Koerner, Alan Morgan and Jerry McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
