Cases 1 - 10 of 75
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCHUGH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01589
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff:
MARY JO MCHUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERROD et al v. MCHUGH et al
as 1:2016cv00816
Plaintiff:
EUGENE SHERROD
Defendant:
PHILLIP MCHUGH , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
JENKINS v. MCHUGH et al
as 1:2015cv01413
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MELVIN JENKINS
Defendant:
JOHN M. MCHUGH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
DUPES v. MCHUGH
as 1:2015cv01047
Defendant:
JOHN M. MCHUGH
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DUPES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ARNOLD v. MCHUGH
as 1:2015cv00772
Plaintiff:
COREY ARNOLD
Defendant:
JOHN M. MCHUGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
STATE OF ALABAMA v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2015cv00696
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Movant:
WATER WORKS & SANITARY SEWER BOARD OF THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2015cv00699
Plaintiff:
ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN M. MCHUGH, JO-ELLEN DARCY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
