Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Medela, Inc. et al v. Gogotech, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00582
Plaintiff:
Medela, Inc. and Medela Holding AG
Defendant:
Gogotech, Inc. and Online Phone Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
GeoTag Inc v. The Western Union Company et al
as 2:2010cv00574
Plaintiff:
GEOTAG, INC.
Defendant:
THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY , WESTERN UNION HOLDINGS, INC. , ALBERTSONS, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP, INC. , TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC. , THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY and others
Counter_defendant:
GEOTAG, INC. , ALBERTSONS, LLC and ALBERTSONS, INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
MapQuest, Inc. a/k/a MapQuest.com Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP D/B/A FIFTH THIRD BANK
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Texas Data Co., L.L.C. v. Medela, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
Texas Data Co., L.L.C.
Defendant:
Medela, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Englehardt v. Medela, Inc.
as 1:2010cv01638
Plaintiff:
Edward T. Englehardt
Defendant:
Medela, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. et al v. Medela AG et al
as 5:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kinetic Concepts, Inc., Kinetic Concepts, Inc., Kinetic Concepts, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Medela AG and Medela, Inc.
Counter Plaintiff:
Medela, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Kinetic Concepts, Inc., Kinetic Concepts, Inc., Kinetic Concepts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Medela, Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00449
Plaintiff:
Medela, Inc. and Medela, Inc.
Defendant:
Kinetic Concepts, Inc., KCI Licensing, Inc., KCI USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Kinetic Concepts Inc et al v. Medela AG et al
as 2:2007cv00187
Plaintiff:
Kinetic Concepts Inc, KCI Licensing Inc, KCI USA Inc and others
Defendant:
Medela AG and Medela Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
