Cases 1 - 10 of 274
Moskowitz Family LLC v. Globus Medical, Inc.
as 24-1753
Plaintiff:
MOSKOWITZ FAMILY LLC
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
Moskowitz Family LLC v. Globus Medical, Inc.
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
MOSKOWITZ FAMILY LLC
Defendant:
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
NINE LINE MEDICAL, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
NINE LINE MEDICAL, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MARATHON MEDICAL CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
MARATHON MEDICAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Insulet Corp. v. Eoflow, Co. Ltd.
as 24-1137
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INSULET CORP.
Defendant / Appellant:
EOFLOW, CO. LTD. and EOFLOW, INC.
Defendant:
STEVEN DIIANNI, LUIS J. MALAVE, IAN G. WELSFORD and others
Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 24-1125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
REX MEDICAL, L.P.
Defendant / Appellant:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC. and INTUITIVE SURGICAL HOLDINGS, LLC
Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 24-1072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REX MEDICAL, L.P.
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. and INTUITIVE SURGICAL HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Rasmussen Instruments, LLC v. DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
as 24-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RASMUSSEN INSTRUMENTS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC., DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC. and MEDICAL DEVICE BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
Rasmussen Instruments, LLC v. DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
as 23-2399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RASMUSSEN INSTRUMENTS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC. and DEPUY SYNTHES SALES, INC.
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEVICE BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
AETNA INC. MEDICAL DENTAL BENEFIT PLAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
AETNA INC. MEDICAL DENTAL BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
