Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hyper Ice, Inc. et al v. Meijer Inc
as 1:2024cv03311
Plaintiff:
Hyper Ice, Inc. and Hyperice IP Subco, LLC
Defendant:
Meijer Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lewis v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2023cv10117
Plaintiff:
Margaret Lewis
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014cv10150
In Re:
Opana ER Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Value Drug Company, Kim Mahaffay and others
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ennis v. Meijer, Inc.
as 3:2021cv50422
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ennis
Defendant:
Meijer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Martin v. Meijer, Inc. d/b/a Meijer et al
as 1:2020cv06580
Defendant:
Meijer Group, Inc., Meijer, Inc. d/b/a Meijer, Meijer Great Lakes Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tyson v. Meijer, Inc.
as 1:2019cv05794
Defendant:
Meijer, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Juliette Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Meijer Inc
as 1:2019cv02941
Defendant:
Meijer Inc
Plaintiff:
George Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hobbs v. Meijer, Inc., a Michigan corporation et al
as 1:2019cv03564
Defendant:
Meijer, Inc., a Michigan corporation and Meijer, Inc
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
