Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thompson v. Coulter
as 23-4005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESLEY THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MEL COULTER
Thompson v. Coulter
as 16-4042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MEL COULTER
Ordonez v. Sorensen et al
as 2:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Mario Ordonez
Defendant:
Dennis Sorensen, John Irons, Mel Coulter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leishman v. Patterson, et al
as 14-4076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP M. LEISHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM PATTERSON, Executive Director of the UDOC, MIKE HADDON, Deputy Director of the UDOC, LOWELL CLARK, Director of Institutional Operations for UDOC and others
Fleming v. Coulter, et al
as 12-4184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL STANLEY FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
MEL COULTER, Captain, Central Utah Correctional Facility, DARWIN JOHNSON, Corrections Officer, Central Utah Correctional Facility, TROY KENNEDY, Corrections Officer, Central Utah Correctional Officer and others
Thompson v. Coulter
as 2:2012cv00680
Plaintiff:
Wesley Thompson
Defendant:
Mel Coulter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. Bigelow, et al
as 12-4042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAYNE E. TODD
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFRED BIGELOW, DENNIS SORENSEN, also know as FNU Sorenen, JOHN IRONS, also know as FNU Irons and others
Fleming v. Coulter, et al
as 11-4067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL STANLEY FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
MEL COULTER, Captain, Central Utah Correctional Facility, DARWIN JOHNSON, Corrections Officer, Central Utah Correctional Facility, TROY KENNEDY, Corrections Officer, Central Utah Correctional Officer and others
Leishman v. Patterson et al
as 2:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Leishman
Defendant:
Tom Patterson, Mike Haddon, Lowell Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gowers v. Haleen et al
as 2:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
David Karl Gowers
Defendant:
FNU Haleen, FNU Estey, Devon Blood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
