Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-56453
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Office of the Governor, WILLIAM C. BEVERLY, Judge, the chief Law Officer, STEVEN R. YANSICKLEN, the successor in interest and others
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. T. Sander
as 14-15673
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: T. SANDERS
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. George Giurbino, et al
as 11-16630
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGE GIURBINO, Director of Corrections of the State of California, GREG D. LEWIS, Warden of Pelican Bay State Prison, K. CRUISE and others
In re: Melvin Simmons, Jr.
as 11-80144
Respondent: In re: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. T. Felker
as 11-70171
Petitioner: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Respondent: T. FELKER, Warden
In re: Melvin Simmons, Jr.
as 10-60030
Debtor: In re: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Appellant: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Appellee: RYAN LUCKSINGER and UST - UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, SACRAMENTO
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. K. Williams, et al
as 10-15825
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: K. WILLIAMS, T. VIRGA and JAMES WALKER
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. K. Williams, et al
as 10-15161
Plaintiff - Appellant: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: K. WILLIAMS, T. VIRGA and JAMES WALKER
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. USDC-CAC
as 08-73480
: In re: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Petitioner: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: T. FELKER
Melvin Simmons, Jr. v. The State of California, et al
as 08-56255
Petitioner - Appellant: MELVIN JOSEPH SIMMONS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, T. FELKER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?