Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE, P.C. v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2012cv03555
Plaintiff:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE, P.C., DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN I. SUTTER, M.D.
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Petitioner:
BELLAFLOR A. TROMPETA and GEORGE E. NAKASHIMA, M.D.
Respondent:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE (GSK)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
JUDAY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02037
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
PAT JUDAY and CHRIS JUDAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ford v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20079
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE ROTAVIRUS VACCINES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2018cv01851
Plaintiff:
SCHWARTZ PEDIATRICS S.C.
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SUGARTOWN PEDIATRICS, LLC v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2018cv01734
Plaintiff:
SUGARTOWN PEDIATRICS, LLC
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NAKASHIMA et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2014cv06447
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. NAKASHIMA and BELLAFLOR A. TROMPETA
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
WESTAWSKI v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2014cv03239
Plaintiff:
JONI WESTAWSKI
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514
PILDIS v. CIGNA CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv01703
Plaintiff:
JOANN PILDIS
Defendant:
CIGNA CORP., CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
KLEIN v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2012cv03857
Plaintiff:
ANDREW KLEIN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv02558
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and MERCK/SCHERING-PLOUGH PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
