Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mercy General Hospital, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5013
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mercy General Hospital, Regional Medical Center of San Jose, also known as Alexian Brothers of San Jose, Inc., formerly known as Alexian Brothers Hospital, AHMC Anaheim Regional Medical Center, also known as Anaheim Memorial Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee: Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Dignity Health v. Health Care Service Corporation
as 1:2022cv06969
Plaintiff: DIGNITY HEALTH, a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation and Dignity Health a California not-for-profit healthcare corporation doing business as Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital doing business as Mercy San Juan Medical Center doing business as Mark Twain Medical Center San Andreas doing business as Saint Franci
Defendant: HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, a Mutual Legal Reserve Co. d.b.a. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, Health Care Service Corporation a Mutual Legal Reserve Co doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Harrell v. Abbott Laboratories et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03590
Plaintiff: Nakisha Harrell
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories and Dignity Health doing business as Mercy San Juan Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01397
Plaintiff: SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, MILLS-PENINSULA MEDICAL CENTER, MEMORIALCARE ORANGE COAST MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2020cv03485
Plaintiff: WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP HOSPITAL DISTRICT doing business as WASHINGTON HOSPITAL, COUNTY OF KERN doing business as KERN MEDICAL CENTER, DIGNITY HEALTH doing business as ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II, XAVIER BECERRA and NORRIS COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Regents of the Uni. of Cal., et al v. Sylvia Burwell
as 16-5098
Plaintiff - Appellant: Regents of the University of California, On behalf of its participating Plaintiff-hospitals, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, UC Davis Medical Center and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: California Pacific Medical Center - Davies Campus, California Pacific Medical Center - Pacific Campus, California Pacific Medical Center - St. Luke's Campus, formerly known as St. Luke's Hospital and others
Defendant - Appellee: Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2015cv01524
Plaintiff: ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER , BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM , MARTIN LUTHER HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA INC et al v. SEBELIUS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00683
Plaintiff: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, INC. , RONALD REAGAN UCLA MEDICAL CENTER , UC DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Lavender et al v. Bal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff: Teresa Lavender , Cindy Lavender Copp , Steve Lavender and others
Defendant: Jagdeep S. Bal , Ampla Health , Kevin S. Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2009cv01441
Plaintiff: ARROYO GRANDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651 Medical Care Recovery
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?