Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
McGill, Rodney v. Garland
as 1:2024cv20468
Plaintiff:
Rodney Maurice McGill, Sr.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CRAWFORD v. GARLAND
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D CRAWFORD and ASIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
COLETTE PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Philippeaux v. Byron et al
as 5:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Philander Philippeaux
Defendant:
Paul G. Byron, Merrick Garland and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
TYRONE L SMITH
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, JOE BIDEN and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
TYRONE L SMITH
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia Encarnacion v. Ripa et al
as 1:2022cv23154
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Mejia Encarnacion
Defendant:
Mr. Garrett Ripa, Tae D Johnson, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
