Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ace Endico Corp. v. Metropolitan Foods, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv07812
Plaintiff:
Ace Endico Corp.
Defendant:
Metropolitan Foods, Inc. d/b/a Driscoll Foods and Matthew Wasserman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Metropolitan Foods, Inc. d/b/a Driscoll Foods, Inc. v. NYTDA, Inc,
as 1:2023cv00973
Plaintiff:
Driscoll Foods, Inc and Metropolitan Foods, Inc. d/b/a Driscoll Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
NYTDA, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gonzalez v. Metropolitan Foods Inc.
as 1:2021cv10635
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anthony Gonzalez
Defendant:
Metropolitan Foods Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Boyd v. Tiburcio-Lora et al
as 1:2021cv04075
Defendant:
Javier Tiburcio-Lora and Metropolitan Foods Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terry J Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Metropolitan Foods, Inc. v. Tenenbaum
as 1:2019cv06700
Defendant:
JERALD TENENBAUM
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN FOODS INC. d/b/a DRISCOLL FOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 133
Juarez v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2019cv04874
Plaintiff:
Jose Juarez
Defendant:
Driscoll Foods, Metropolitan Foods, Inc. and Calvin D. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 au
Almazar v. Ladson
as 1:2015cv09417
Plaintiff:
Rafael Almazar
Defendant:
Taihibi Ladson and Metropolitan Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
METROPOLITAN FOODS, INC. v. KELSCH et al
as 2:2011cv03306
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN FOODS, INC.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KELSCH, ACE/ENDICO, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
METROPOLITAN FOODS, INC. v. THE MIRACLE MAKERS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv04708
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN FOODS, INC.
Defendant:
THE MIRACLE MAKERS, INC., PAMELA LINDO-BUTTS and DELOIS PICKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
