Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
RUFUS v. HEAD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00168
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent: FREDERICK HEAD and HOMER BRYSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUFUS v. HEAD et al
as 3:2017cv00111
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent: FREDERICK HEAD and HOMER BRYSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00037
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RUFUS v. HEAD et al
as 3:2015cv00066
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant: FREDERICK J HEAD, GEO GROUP INC, ALISON T BURLESON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFUS v. HEAD
as 3:2014cv00113
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent: FREDERICK J HEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rufus v. Kemp
as 3:2013cv00064
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent: RALPH KEMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00133
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rufus v. Kemp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00058
Petitioner: Michael Alonza Rufus
Respondent: Ralph Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rufus v. State of Georgia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03869
Plaintiff: Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant: State of Georgia, Samuel D. Ozburn, Public Defender Office of the Alcovy Judicial Circuit and others
RUFUS v UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 3:2012cv00099
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?