Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Byrne et al v Juul Labs
as 3:2020cv08498
Defendant: Altria Enterprises, LLC, Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company and others
Plaintiff: Michael Byrne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35513
Plaintiff / Appellant: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL BYRNE, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff: WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant: OREGON WILD, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation and AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WOODHOUSE FARMING AND SEED COMPANY, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, MICHAEL BYRNE and others
Plaintiff: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Audubon Society of Portland, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 20-35509
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL BYRNE, TALLY HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, DBA Walker Brothers, TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Plaintiff: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WATERWATCH OF OREGON, An Oregon nonprofit corporation, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, An Oregon nonprofit corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of the Interior, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior
Stacey Richards v. James Cox, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17193
Defendant: WILLIAM GITTERE, MICHAEL BYRNE and MICHAEL FLETCHER
Plaintiff / Appellee: STACEY M. RICHARDS
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES GREG COX, ERIC BOARDMAN and RENEE BAKER, Warden
Byrne v. Verifone Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02926
Plaintiff: Michael Byrne
Defendant: Verifone Systems, Inc., Alex Way Hart, Robert W. Alspaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Hale v. Director Cox et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02433
Defendant: Michael Byrne, Gloria Carpenter, Director Cox and others
Plaintiff: Tashaun S. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Cox et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01794
Defendant: Renee Baker, Eric Boardman, Michael Byrne and others
Plaintiff: Stacey M. Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dzik v. Baker et al
as 3:2016cv00228
Defendant: Renee Baker, Michael Byrnes, E.K. McDaniels and others
Plaintiff: Mitchell Dzik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dzik v. Baker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00210
Defendant: Renee Baker, Michael Byrnes, E.K. McDaniel and others
Plaintiff: Mitchell Dzik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?