Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hollowell v. Barnett et al
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Defendant:
Norman L. Barnett, Stephanie E. Gabay-Smith, Byron L. Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Carr et al
as 1:2021cv02799
Plaintiff:
Zekemian Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Michael Carr, Andy Pascuals, Daniel M. Coursey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv04002
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Social Security Regional Administrator - NEF Only
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daker v. Carr et al
as 1:2020cv01679
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Rebecca J. Dobras, Georgia Department of Law, Patricia Beth Attaway Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMILLION v. SMITH et al
as 4:2019cv00223
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CARR
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GOMILLION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REDFORD v. SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2019cv00114
Respondent:
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CARR, STEPHEN E CASTLERS and others
Petitioner:
MIKE REDFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Carr et al
as 1:2018cv03297
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Law, Patricia Beth Attaway-Burton, Amy M. Radley and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Ford
as 1:2017cv01064
Petitioner:
Michael Carr
Respondent:
Benjamin Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carr v. Mutti et al
as 1:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr
Defendant:
Stephanie Mutti, Fulton County Georgia and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
