Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Arrington v. Spencer et al
as 1:2019cv20666
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Vernis and Bowling of Miami, P.A., First Financial Insurance Company, Cary C. Woods, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrington v. Green et al
as 9:2019cv80008
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Rapid Auto Loan, The Reserve At Lakeside, Senator Philip D. Lewis Resource Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrington v. Green et al
as 9:2017cv81275
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Sherry Green, Senator Philip D. Lewis Resource Center, Unknown Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington v. Spencer et al
as 1:2017cv22921
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Carolyn Spencer, First Financial Insurance Company, Cary C. Woods , II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arrington v. Hausman et al
as 0:2016cv60532
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Harry M. Hausman, Amy Kirschner Hyman and Louis Jerry Cohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrington v. Hausman et al
as 0:2015cv62326
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Harry M. Hausman, Amy Kirschner Hyman and Louis Jerry Cohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv24114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrington v. Hausman
as 0:2015cv60642
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Harry Hausman and Harry M. Hausman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv21807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arrington v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2008cv21383
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Arrington
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
